The historical word for the final collection of Scriptures is ‘canon’.
Definition of canon:
A rule or standard. ‘The term itself is a Greek word that referred to a staff or straight rod used as a means of measurement. The term soon came to mean a “rule” or “standard.” In the history of the Christian church the term came to be used with respect to the books that were judged to be the “standard” by which the church should live.’
[1] ‘The word canon today refers to a “collection or list of books accepted as an authoritative rule of faith and practice.’
[2]The Bible is our Rule. It is our Standard for life:
How can a young man keep his way pure?
By guarding it according to your word. Psalm 119:9
I will never forget your precepts,
for by them you have given me life. Psalm 119:93
Process of the canon:
Because God did not simply drop the completed Bible out of heaven into the laps of those who have gone on before, we need to understand the process that He took to reveal Himself to His people. How did these specific books come to be recognized as the standard or ruler for the People of God? ‘The Scripture itself bears witness to the historical development of the canon.’
[3]
Hebrews 1:1-2 gives an indication of the process when it tells us that 'long ago, at many time and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son...' In the Old Testament God spoke to His people through men called prophets. These men recorded His Word and collected it so that the Coming One would be revealed. It is through this means that the promise of Christ came to the world. The New Testament even bears witness of this process. Paul says in Romans 1:2 that the gospel of God was 'promised beforehand through the prophets in the Holy Scriptures.' Peter testifies in 2 Peter 1:21 that 'men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Spirit.' In the following section we will see in greater detail the witness of the Old and New Testaments concerning this process.
The Old Testament bears witness to the process of the developing of the writings that were recognized as the standard of God; His Word:
† Everything began with the voice of God (Genesis 1:3).
† The first collection of the words of God are the Ten ‘Words’ (commandments)(Exodus 20:1ff; Deuteronomy 5ff). These were written by the finger of God (Exodus 31:18) hence they carry the full authority of God over His creation.
† The next collection of words were recorded by Moses and deposited in the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord so that it would be there for a witness against the Israelites (Deuteronomy 31:24-26: cf. Exodus 17:14, 24:4; 34:27; Numbers 33:2; Deuteronomy 31:22). Moses recorded the first five books of our canon.
† Joshua recorded what happened after Moses died (Joshua 24:26).
There are numerous other individuals who are listed as ‘writers’ of the Old Testament:
† The prophet Samuel in 1 Samuel 10:25.
† The prophet Nathan in 1 Chronicles 29:29.
† The prophet Isaiah in 2 Chronicles 26:22.
† The prophet Jeremiah in Jeremiah 30:2.
The Old Testament was cherished and protected by God and His People for many centuries.
The completed Canon (collection of authorized books) of the Old Testament is recognized early (as early as 250-200BC there is evidence that the Old Testament was recognized as a completed collection of the Words of God). This is seen in the writings of early Jewish historians. It is confirmed in the New Testament writings by the fact that ‘Jesus and the New Testament authors quote various parts of the Old Testament Scriptures as divinely authoritative over 295 times, but not once do they cite any statement from the books of the Apocrypha or any other writings as having divine authority.’
[4]The New Testament also bears witness to the process of the developing of the writings that were recognized as the standard of God; His Word:
We may summarize the concept of revelation in the New Testament age with six points:
[5]1) Jesus of Nazareth is revealed as True God and He spoke with authority. In the Gospels, Christ the incarnate Word, whom John announced as the Messiah of the Old Testament, claims to have supreme, ultimate, and absolute authority, the authority of the Lord God Himself (see Matthew 9:2; 11:27; 28:18; Luke 21:33).
2) Jesus of Nazareth authorizes His disciples to speak for Him. In the Gospels, Christ calls, equips, and sends out apostles to speak and act with His authority, and provides for their continuing authoritative witness (Luke 6:13; 9:1-6 [here they are assigned an “internship” in exercising this authority], John 14:25-2616:12-15; 17:20 [here they are assured that they need not rely on their memories for knowledge and accuracy; the Holy Spirit will aid them; here also, as church missionaries, they are to go forth as Christ’s “plenipotentatires,” having His authority]).
3) God continues to authenticate the message of the Apostles throughout Acts. In the New Testament age, following the resurrection and ascension of Christ, the apostles are authenticated as Christ’s authoritative representatives by the “marks of the apostle” (Acts 5:12; 2 Corinthians 12:12; Hebrews 2:4).
4) The message of the Apostles was considered the authority and was collected and studied by the church. The apostolic witness, which was in the first instance and for the most part oral, progressively culminated in the written apostolic tradition, which in turn became authoritative and normative in the church for faith and practice (1 Thessalonians 2:13; 5:27; 2 Thessalonians 2:15; 3:6, 14; 2 Corinthians 10:8; 13:10; Ephesians 3:1-4; Colossians 4:16; 1 John 1:1-4; 4:6; John 20:30-31).
5) The Church made no distinction between the Old Testament Scriptures and the Apostles writings. The Church received these apostolic writings as being on a par with the Old Testament Scriptures (explicitly stated in 1 Timothy 5:18 [see Luke 10:7]; 2 Peter 3:16; implicitly stated in 1 Thessalonians 5:27; Colossians 4:16; 1 Timothy 4:13; Revelation 1:3).
6) The New Testament writings were not authorized by the Church but were the authority of the Church. The postapostolic church did not “canonize’ the New Testament Scriptures but only declared that it had received them as authoritative and thus normative from the beginning as an inspired body of literature. The earliest list containing only the 27 New Testament books occurs in a letter of Athanasius, A.D. 367; the first council to affirm the 27 New Testament books was the Third Council of Carthage, A.D. 397.
The Church did not make the books of the New Testament canonical. ‘Ultimately it is the creative life of Jesus Christ, not the evangelists or the Church, that originates, controls and gives essential unity to the documents through which witness is borne to His achievement as the Messiah, the Son of God.’
[6] The Church simply recognized which books were in fact "the rule of faith," i.e., the inspired Scriptures. The N.T. is therefore a collection of authoritative books rather than an authoritative collection of books.
[7]How then did the writings come about? How do we know that they are true?
Importance of inspiration: The Bible is actually God speaking.
‘Our word 'inspired' comes from a Latin root meaning, “to breathe in.” Unfortunately, that does not convey the true meaning of the Greek term for “inspired” that is used in Scripture. Actually the concept of breathing in is not found in 2 Timothy 3:16 (“All Scripture is inspired by God”). Reading this meaning in has misled many people about the true meaning of inspiration. They have assumed that God breathed some kind of divine life into the words of those who penned the original documents of Scripture. But the Greek term for inspiration is
theopneustos, which means “God-breathed.” Literally the verse says, All Scripture is God-breathed” – that is, Scripture is not the words of man into which God puffed divine life.
It is the very breath of God! Scripture is God Himself speaking.’
[8]
Even when one of His servants speaks in the power of God, His Word accomplishes It's task. 'When Peter said to the lame man, "in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up, and walk," the voice which spoke was Peter's, but the power which restored the ankle bones, was God's. The words, though Peter's, were spoken under divine influence, or the divine power would not have accompanied them.'
[9]Importance of revelation: The Bible reveals something we cannot know on our own.
'Because all other means of knowledge are insufficient to bring men to holiness and happiness, God has been pleased, in pity to our race, to make known His will by special revelation. Besides His voice in conscience and in Nature, He utters His voice from heaven. This revelation was anciently made by prophets, who were commissioned to speak to men in His name, and afterwards by His Son from heaven. To us, in these latter days, He speaks in His written Word, the Bible, which is the perfect source of religious knowledge, and the infallible standard of religious truth.'
[10]The very word 'revelation' implies that there is something beyond our knowledge. We have been refused disclosure. It must then be revealed to us. Without God’s gracious revelation of it we are hopeless. It was a secret. God kept it to Himself. It was His eternal plan (Isaiah 6:9-10; Romans 11:7-10, 25ff). He kept it secluded for ages and generations. If it was concealed for ages that means it has been there over the years (ages) and throughout the relationship God had with His people (generations). Jesus, in Matthew 11:25 and Luke 10:21, speaks of this hiding. He showed it to His saints. He revealed it. Revelation has everything to do with Him and His will. We did not, nor could ever, 'figure it all out' and then make the connections. He had to open our eyes so that we could see! He showed it to us. Where? In His Word! (2 Peter 1:16ff; Titus 1:9). The whole idea of Revelation presupposes some kind of content already existent and a pre-existent Revealer.
Have you asked this Revealer to open your eyes to see wonderful things from His law (Psalm 119:18)? Have you just assumed in your ignorance and on his kindness? Open His Word and see His face today!
[1] Robert Stein, A Basic Guide to Interpreting the Bible; Playing by the Rules (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1994) page 63.
[2] Paul D. Wegner, The Journey from Texts to Translations; The Origin and Development of the Bible (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1999) page 101.
[3] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology; An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994) page 54. I depended on this chapter of Grudem’s book very heavily for this section.
[4] Ibid, 57, Italics mine.
[5] Robert Reymond, A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith, page 10-11.
[6] William L. Lane, The Gospel of Mark, page 7.
[7] Robert Stein, Lecture on the Canon of Scripture.
[8] John MacArthur, Charismatic Chaos, page59-60.
[9] J.L. Dagg, Manual of Theology, pages 22-23.
[10] J.L. Dagg, Manual of Theology, page 21.
Labels: Southern Baptist Primer